[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: grouping of alternative depends

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:13:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>         And that bug on policy would have to show more reason than "I do
>  not find it pretty enough" to show why we need to modify policy, and

(Note that I did not suggest that, I just pointed out that dpkg
 wouldn't have been the right target to shoot at.)

FWIW, I'm fine with CNF dependencies.


Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: