Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:51:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.0903220749510.16014@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090321221354.GB5004@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.0903200844150.9783@wr-linux02> <[🔎] 20090321221354.GB5004@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>

On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:

Please note that debian-l10n-english suggests using the enumeration
style you mention for a2ps, when we're reviewing package
descriptions...


BTW, once you answered in this thread: Shouldn't we make the suggested
enhancements part of the Smith-Project?

Kind regards

      Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions
  - From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>

References:
- RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions
  - From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Extended descriptions size (was Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions)
Next by Date: Re: Sponsorship requirements and copyright files
Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions
Next by thread: Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread