> > I've not looked at this at all - but the idea of shared sockets > > in /tmp which I recall from a previous message in the thread jumped out > > at me as being a recipe for symlink attacks, if nothing else. [Mike Hommey] > Screen does that too, so that would hardly be less secure than screen. Well, if by "in /tmp" you mean "in /var/run/screen". -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/