Hi, On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Carsten Hey wrote: > In my opinion it is a way better practise to first update the policy and > then adapt n packages instead of first change them in a way which is > possibly against the policy and expect the policy to be updated > accordingly. There is nothing _against_ current policy in this proposal. Also it's current policy (AIUI) that policy is modeled after current best practice and not the other way around. > > > With mere "provides:" (a virtual package), you'd have a version of > > > both exim4 and exim5 that provides default-mta. In unstable, yes, but where is the problem? And for testing and stable this MUST be avoided :-) regards, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.