Hi, On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > ISTR (some of) -legal@ saying not DFSG-compliant, some people on -legal will always disagree, what counts more is the (rough) consenus... > ftpmasters saying yes, and ftpmaster, obviously :) > Looking at the pool: wow, I'm surprised to see 2.0 and 2.5 licences there. AFAIU (and I've read those licences...) and AFAIK, cc-by-sa 3.0 is fine for main, previous versions not. So I guess some bugs are in order to be filed... regards, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.