On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:25:12 +0200 Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de> wrote: >From #501423: FTBFS in lenny: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: libloudmouth1-dev(inst 1.4.0-1 ! >= wanted 1.4.1) > Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2008, 18:57 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams: > > Migration to testing happens automatically from unstable, you should > > have received notification of the migration, there is no approval > > needed. > > Not during a freeze, where an exception is required. Oops. Got my dates wrong. Sorry. Freeze: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:00:53 +0200 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/07/msg00007.html The gossip upload was made: Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:52:40 +0200 It migrated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:39:16 +0000 There's no sign of a request on the debian-release mailing list (Sep or Oct 08). I'm assuming there are records of unblocks beyond the mailing list archive? > I uploaded gossip and loudmouth to unstable, and wanted to ask for an > approval, but then an RC bug was filed against loudmouth, that's why I > didn't ask for approval yet. > > > Are you saying that gossip should be removed from testing and therefore > > removed from the release? > > No. But we now really need a fix for the loudmouth RC bug. As that bug doesn't affect testing, it is not exactly a priority for bug fixes prior to the release. Is it worth investigating why britney got it wrong and whether gossip 1:0.30-1 can be reinstated? $ rmadison libloudmouth1-0 .... libloudmouth1-0 | 1.4.0-1 | testing | alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libloudmouth1-0 | 1.4.2-1 | unstable | alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc How did gossip migrate with Build-Depends on a version of libloudmouth1-0 that still does not exist in Lenny? -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpIfqPiVxh6_.pgp
Description: PGP signature