[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should selinux be standard?



Le lundi 15 septembre 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Bastian Blank a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:12:03PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le lundi 15 septembre 2008 à 10:12 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> > > > Agreed. Either SELinux is suitable with our default setup and we
> > > > should enable it by default to get all its alleged benefits, or it is
> > > > not, and we should simply not install it.
> > >         Since the new default policy seems to be working in targeted
> > >  mode, I think we are doing fine.
> > Fine. Then let’s enable it by default.
> 
> Oh yeah. Do you intend to do the support?

No, but Manoj seems to be willing, since SELinux is working “fine” now.

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


Reply to: