[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#159385: marked as done (general: install a package but don't have it's magic funcionality on by default)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:04:43 +0200
with message-id <200809130004.44429.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line just a tag is not documentation...
has caused the Debian Bug report #107862,
regarding general: install a package but don't have it's magic funcionality on by default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
107862: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=107862
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-03
Severity: minor

First examine a bug report I sent regarding a typical package, "bl":

My idea of inviting bl onto my computer was that it would be there
when i need it, but not on by default.  as there is no easy way of
configuring it not to start on login, therefore i am removing it.

That's the problem with debian, for me.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

I'm closing this bug ("newly installed services start automatically") which is 
rightfully tagged "wontfix", as there is no information in the bug and the 
merged bug, why it's tagged that way and so it's useless to keep it open.
(Not sure if this is documented in policy or not, but I also think it's 
obvious that packages should work out of the box :) (If this can be done in a 
secure fashion.)

Thus closing because it's obvious. It's also obvious that we wontfix this. 
(IMHO.)


regards,
	Holger

Attachment: pgpcn2quBTq05.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: