Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:29:53 +0200 with message-id <200809031029.53753.holger@layer-acht.org> and subject line "How 'bout just filing wishlist bugs with patches?" has caused the Debian Bug report #170472, regarding info: top Info pages of different packages wildly differ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 170472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=170472 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Cc: bug-gawk@gnu.org, bug-texinfo@gnu.org
- Subject: info: top Info pages of different packages wildly differ
- From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@dman.ddts.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 06:18:15 +0800
- Message-id: <E18FibP-0000Md-00@debian>
Package: info Version: 4.1-2 Severity: normal Gentlemen, the top Info pages of different packages wildly differ: e.g. $ info m4 has a nice header "GNU m4" but $ info gawk has a lower level header 'General introduction', while $ info yorick has a menu without a header, while $ info emacs says "the emacs editor", even better than "GNU m4" which doesn't mention if it is an editor or a language, etc. Therefore folks should make top Info nodes with proper headers. How about a debian Info pages policy. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 Versions of packages info depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 170472-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: "How 'bout just filing wishlist bugs with patches?"
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:29:53 +0200
- Message-id: <200809031029.53753.holger@layer-acht.org>
Hi, (this bug is about "top Info pages of different packages wildly differ".) "How 'bout just filing wishlist bugs with patches?" sounds like a reasonable approach to me, thus closing this meta bugreport. Also _not_ reassigning to debian-policy, as there is no consensus to demand this and policy shall describe current best practice, which obviously doesnt exist here. regards, HolgerAttachment: pgpRvG0NyuuRc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---