Re: Bug#484009: removed bugs are marked as 'obsolete'
On Wed June 4 2008 00:59:15 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> a broken software, or an inadequate one is more a problem to
> me than not having it in Debian. Debian is about quality, not
> quantity.
(1) Pierre thus asserts IMPERFECT PACKAGE < MISSING PACKAGE.
(2) To a user who wishes to use a working feature of an imperfect
package, Debian is better with the imperfect package than
without: MISSING PACKAGE < IMPERFECT PACKAGE < PERFECT PACKAGE.
This is true even if the imperfect package has an avoidable
publicized security bug.
(3) The Debian Social Contract[1] strongly supports user empowerment,
e.g. "We will place their interests first in our priorities."
(4) Therefore, the laudable but minor goal of reducing clutter is not
a DSC-compatible reason for ignoring users' interests.
--Mike Bird
[1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract
Reply to: