Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)
From: Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:22:37 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080514232237.GA31252@moregruel.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080514231226.GA4481@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
References: <87skwkg97p.fsf@mirexpress.internal.placard.fr.eu.org> <[🔎] 87skwky1vb.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <[🔎] 20080514231226.GA4481@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>

On 14-May-08, 18:12 (CDT), "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> wrote: 
> Therefore, anyone who had a DSA key has had it compromised...

Shouldn't that be "anyone who had a DSA key *created by the flawed
version of openssl* has had it compromised..."? Or are you asserting
something stronger?

Steve

-- 
Steve Greenland
    The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
    system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
    world.       -- seen on the net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)
  - From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

References:
- SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)
  - From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>
- Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)
  - From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>

Prev by Date: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)
Next by Date: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)
Previous by thread: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)
Next by thread: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread