Re: intend to hijack GnuPG
On 2008-05-02, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
>
> --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:36:25PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> Yes. But after I have seen Laszlo Boszormenyi bughandling in sqlite3, I
>> think I actually would prefer current maintainance of gnupg.
>>=20
>> 478980 and 478337
>
> Whatever it might have happened on those 2 bug reports, which I haven't
> read, I find really annoying your public blaming behaviour.
Didn't this thread by the way more or less start with public blaming of
current gnupg maintainer?
> Either step
> in and offer help or shut up.
gnupg is a a bit too important package to be maintained by just anyone.
I wouldn't have objected if it was unimportant leaf package - as all
people have to start somewhere in learning packaging.
This is why I am not shutting up. I hope most people will speak up
publically in such cases. [1]
- oh - and about offering to help: I was so far the one filed the
"should this package be orphaned"-bug against gnupg. And I am
planning to follow up on that. (476418)
/Sune
[1] I am not blaming people for introducing bugs. That can happen. The
issue is how people handle it and tries to fix it up.
Reply to: