[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Missing Build-Conflicts for non-clean build environments: RC? (was: Re: Bug#508947: Lowering severity)

On 2008-12-20, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:12:48AM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> >> I don't agree with your arguing. Serious is defined as "severe violation
>> >> of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or "required"
>> >> directive)". Debian policy 7.7 says:=20
>> >> |Build-Depends, Build-Conflicts
>> >> |    The Build-Depends and Build-Conflicts fields must be satisfied when
>> >> |any of the following targets is invoked: build, clean, binary,
>> >> |binary-arch, build-arch, build-indep and binary-indep.
>> >> It does not mention a clean chroot. Afaik it also violates the policy if
>> >> a packages build in fully installed chroot ist linked against
>> >> more/different libraries than the same package build in a clean chroot.
>> Up to the etch release, I asked release people wether missing
>> build-dependencies was release critical. They said no.
> Er, what?  

Sorry. I was clearly trying to write build-conflicts, but failed.


Reply to: