Re: Should selinux be standard?
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:12:03PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le lundi 15 septembre 2008 à 10:12 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>> > > Agreed. Either SELinux is suitable with our default setup and we
>> > > should enable it by default to get all its alleged benefits, or it is
>> > > not, and we should simply not install it.
>> > Since the new default policy seems to be working in targeted
>> > mode, I think we are doing fine.
>> Fine. Then let’s enable it by default.
> Oh yeah. Do you intend to do the support?
If it is not very functional by default, or it is but nobody is willing to
support it, then it shouldn't be standard; that's the main point.