Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?

To: "William Pitcock" <nenolod@dereferenced.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
From: "Sandro Tosi" <matrixhasu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:47:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 8b2d7b4d0808270747m263dc70fy232207f506fabbdf@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1219846049.6853.1223.camel@petrie.sacredspiral.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20080827104310.GG27628@jones.dk> <[🔎] 1219842909.6853.1210.camel@petrie.sacredspiral.co.uk> <[🔎] 20080827134157.GL27628@jones.dk> <[🔎] 1219846049.6853.1223.camel@petrie.sacredspiral.co.uk>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 16:07, William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org> wrote:
> I am LILO's maintainer. It is hardly unsupported, infact it is supported
> better now than it has been in a long time. While I do plan to drop it
> post-lenny, it will certaintly be supported for lenny's release
> lifecycle.

I hope this will happen if and only if grub/grub2/<any other
bootloader> will support what lilo does, so for example, boot from LVM
/ with no separate /boot .

Cheers,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Reply to:

References:
- Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
  - From: William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org>
- Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
  - From: William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Unusual version numbering systems
Next by Date: Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
Previous by thread: Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
Next by thread: Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread