Bug#161978: this really should be checked by lintian

To: 161978@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#161978: this really should be checked by lintian
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:56:57 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200808251256.58359.holger@layer-acht.org>
Reply-to: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 161978@bugs.debian.org

severity 161978 important
thanks

Hi,

downgrading severity, as this is about an old issue with tetex and because 
there is probably even a lintian check for this already. (Too lazy to confirm 
now, thus I'm also not reassigning the bug to lintian yet.)


regards,
	Holger

Attachment: pgpa2HxLjGjtF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: this really should be checked by lintian
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#161978: this really should be checked by lintian
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Processed: this really should be checked by lintian
Next by Date: Bug#278246: marked as done (Cyrillic letters are displayed as double-width in most places)
Previous by thread: oslec with zaptel and dahdi: dependency for external modules
Next by thread: Processed: this really should be checked by lintian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread