re: FTBS twice - what is the priority for it?
>I am preparing an upload to Sid, with the intent of getting it into
Lenny, for a package of mine (to solve bug #493061 for
>fakeroot-ng, if it matters). While working on it, I found out that the
package also has a FTBS twice bug, which resulted
>from empty lines (with no leading tab character) in debian/rules in
the clean target. My question is - what to do?
I would suggest just fixing it and mentioning the fix in the changelog
as normal. This is a non-invasive change for a release goal issue so per
thier own freeze guidelines the release team should have no problem