Re: "cupsys" renamed to "cups", please adjust your (build-)depends
On 12-Jun-08, 11:23 (CDT), "Bernhard R. Link" <email@example.com> wrote:
> How about using this transition to move some binaries between package
> boundaries? Especially having some programs with generic names in -client and
> some in -bsd seem to be a problem for some users (like #405827).
> I do not think having lp and lpr in different packages can cause any
> good (and the same for lprm and cancel and so on).
Isn't the whole point of having cups-bsd etc. to provide replacement
commands that are compatible with older tools?