Re: Bug#484129: release.debian.org: packages in tasks should be fixed in priority and removed in last resort after discussion
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:22:28 -0700, Mike Bird <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Mon June 2 2008 11:44:46 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> See it the other way around: it shows testing the way stable could be
>> if nothing is done. I'm all for removing buggy packages early in the
>> release cycle: it makes it less likely that we release without a
>> package that many users need, because it was removed too late in the
>> release cycle, and it allow bug fixers to focus on bugs that we
>> really, absolutely need to fix to be able to release.
> A thing is best characterized by what it does and how it is used
> rather than by the name we associate with it. For a moment let's
> recall what Testing really is for most Debian users - Testing is the
> "Debian Desktop Edition".
I thnk that jumping to such conclusions in face of what the
developers tell them makes it their problem.
A husband is what is left of the lover after the nerve has been
extracted. Helen Rowland
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C