[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what about an special QA package priority?

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:03:51PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > So, basically, I welcome your proposal, but IMO its simplest and most
> > effective implementation would be: ``packages scoring high in popcon
> > have to be maintained by teams using some Vcs-*''.
> Why do you want to force the use of a VCS onto a team?

Uh? I'm probably not getting your question, but I do not want to force
the use of a _specific_ VCS, if that is what you meant. Assuming that
the proposal rationale was to give more visibility to what is going on
to a given package, since it is an "important" one, using _whatever_ VCS
sounds like a requirement to me.

Of course you need also to specify that it should be public, better if
it has a web interface to monitor changes and yada yada ...


Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: