[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#480706: buildd.emdebian.org: coreutils fails to cross build

Package: general
Severity: normal

In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that fail to crossbuild successfully, despite
building successfully in the past. i.e. where an existing package in
Emdebian cannot be updated because the new version fails in a new and
different way.

$ emsource --status coreutils
Checking the apt-cross cache is up to date for arm.
Checking status of coreutils in /opt/emdebian/trunk/c/coreutils/trunk/
6 emdebian patch files
0 debian patch files

Checking emdebuild status in /opt/emdebian/trunk/c/coreutils/trunk/
build log:
	coreutils (6.10) FAILED to cross build for arm.

Checking empdebuild status
coreutils may be out of date.
Checking for error logs in /opt/emdebian/trunk/c/coreutils/trunk/
Checking bug status
No open cross-building bugs for coreutils
coreutils FAILED to build.
$ tail /opt/emdebian/trunk/c/coreutils/trunk/coreutils_6.10-6em1_arm.build
/usr/arm-linux-gnu/include/stdio.h:718: error: conflicting types for
./stdio.h:277: error: previous declaration of 'rpl_fseeko' was here
make[3]: *** [areadlink-with-size.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

This is a placeholder bug until buildd.emdebian.org is available as a
pseudo-package but serves to explain why coreutils is not being updated
and the nature of the build failure. See #480514 regarding why the build
logs are not available online yet.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Reply to: