[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork

On lun, 2008-05-05 at 01:19 -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> my understanding is that this is a 'protest' fork made to add a
> feature
> that the upstream did not want(the resizing). So as long as the
> upstream
> resists, it should survive.

I find that a bit too much for a complete fork. Couldn't this be
implemented via a plugin?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: