Re: Using sgid binaries to defend against LD_PRELOAD/ptrace()

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Using sgid binaries to defend against LD_PRELOAD/ptrace()
From: Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:51:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 48150384.7090908@beamnet.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080427102503.GZ16526@riva.ucam.org>
References: <20071207181811.GA2720@piware.de> <[🔎] 1209286359.4588.6.camel@tomoyo> <[🔎] 20080427102503.GZ16526@riva.ucam.org>

Colin Watson wrote:

I think it was my suggestion to Martin in the first place, so no, I
don't have any objection. :-) I haven't been following the thread,
though - has there been general consensus on this?


I must say that the thread did not do much to convince me.[1]

Kind regards

T.

1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00322.html

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using sgid binaries to defend against LD_PRELOAD/ptrace()
  - From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>

References:
- Re: Using sgid binaries to defend against LD_PRELOAD/ptrace()
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Using sgid binaries to defend against LD_PRELOAD/ptrace()
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Convocatoria para Cantar
Next by Date: Re: Using sgid binaries to defend against LD_PRELOAD/ptrace()
Previous by thread: Re: Using sgid binaries to defend against LD_PRELOAD/ptrace()
Next by thread: Re: Using sgid binaries to defend against LD_PRELOAD/ptrace()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread