Re: A suggestion
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: A suggestion
- From: Joel Franco <joel.franco@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:38:36 -0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080401033836.GA4568@netuno>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <d46a3c4a0803280527p469ed8a3hefa2d048306093d2@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <23e20bab0803260002s3c12f9dcl2c6c77bccb434bf1@mail.gmail.com> <20080326125132.GA29904@connexer.com> <200803260835.51417.mgb@yosemite.net> <1206640411.5972.6.camel@shizuru> <d46a3c4a0803280527p469ed8a3hefa2d048306093d2@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri 28 Mar 08 13:27, Fernando Cerezal wrote:
>I have used testing for four years in my desktop without reinstall. Testing may
>be suitable for desktop.
>It has, only a few times, litle bugs, but a desktop is not a critical system.
>I remember an ubuntu update that remove the xorg configuration, so most of its
>users had to reinstall (they dont know how to fix it).
>Testing es perfectly a valid option for desktop.
I think that the testing or above releases may be suitable for the
desktop of a EXPERT linux user. I need a stable release because my
desktop must simply to work; it is not a so critical system like a
server but this is critical to my business go on.
--
|
| Joel Franco Guzmán .''`.
| self-powered by : :' :
| Debian Linux `. `'
| at BraSil `-
Reply to: