Hi
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:43:09 -0600
William Pitcock <nenolod@sacredspiral.co.uk> wrote:
> libprojectM upstream are soon releasing libprojectM 1.1 which makes the
> following breakage:
>
> public: PCM *projectM::pcm
>
> is replaced by:
>
> public: const inline PCM *projectM::pcm() { return _pcm; }
>
> So, is this the proper solution:
>
> * libprojectm1 -> libprojectm2
> * libprojectm-dev -> libprojectm2-dev
> * libprojectm-dev becomes virtual package of libprojectm2-dev
There is no need to rename devel package unless you want to support
both versions of this library.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature