Re: List of packages shipping shell scripts with bashisms + MBF proposal
Russ Allbery <email@example.com> writes:
> Pure POSIX doesn't allow signal numbers, but the XSI extension
> to POSIX does and dash and posh both support them. We do not,
> in general, accept XSI extensions, but it's hard to argue
> strongly for excluding a feature that even posh supports.
Is there a good reason that we do not in general accept XSI
extensions? The ones that I've noticed while reading SUSv3 are
features that I expect a normal Unix system to have.