[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results



On 25/01/08 at 15:36 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Of course, the list includes some false positives, but they are
> > difficult to identify without going through all the debdiff outputs and
> > build logs manually.
> 
> Hmm, the debdiff output is not really helpful in deciding whether my
> packages actually have a problem (doc-linux and libgpod). It just
> reports a different Installed-Size.

For doc-linux, I couldn't find any difference (but it's just a 4 bytes
difference).

For libgod, see
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/01/22/bdfh/libgpod.debcmp
(it's the output from a "better" debdiff that also diffs files that can
be diffed inside binaries). The documentation changes are probably
harmless, but I'm not sure about this one:

@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
 HAVE_STRING_H = _gpod.HAVE_STRING_H
 HAVE_SYS_STAT_H = _gpod.HAVE_SYS_STAT_H
 HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H = _gpod.HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H
+HAVE_TAGLIB = _gpod.HAVE_TAGLIB
 HAVE_UNISTD_H = _gpod.HAVE_UNISTD_H
 PACKAGE = _gpod.PACKAGE
 PACKAGE_BUGREPORT = _gpod.PACKAGE_BUGREPORT
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


Reply to: