Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:00:19 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080104050019.GA16032@zulo.hadrons.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080103095116.GB20980@bee.dooz.org>
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20080103095116.GB20980@bee.dooz.org>

Hi,

On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:51:16 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >    libdvb-dev (U)
> 
>  Only ships static libs; no idea why.

That's due to #218387, #226985 and #359697.

regards,
guillem

Reply to:

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>

Prev by Date: Util-linux mount function source code
Next by Date: Re: Faster shutdown and the ubuntu "multiuser" update-rc.d extention
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread