Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.debian.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:50:48 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] sa4fxxfc053.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org> (Raphael Geissert's message of "Wed\, 02 Jan 2008 13\:58\:24 -0600")
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org>

>>>>> "Raphael" == Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com> writes:

    Raphael> Brian May <bam@snoopy.debian.net>
    Raphael> dar-static

    Raphael> Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
    Raphael> e2fsck-static

Both of these (and maybe others) are false positives.
-- 
Brian May <bam@snoopy.debian.net>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#458811: ITP: mgltools -- preparation of proteins and ligands to analyse their binding
Next by Date: Re: Faster shutdown and the ubuntu "multiuser" update-rc.d extention
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread