[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

On 02/01/2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Your list seems to contain alot of packages that do have a Depends
> > field.
> Like which one? I used a lot of grepping so maybe something was left
> in.

Take any random package, let's say icecc:
$ apt-cache show icecc|grep ^Depends: 
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.6-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.2-20070516), libstdc++6 (>= 4.2-20070516), debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, adduser, lsb-base

A quick look at its content should also convince you that having binary
objects under /usr/bin, /usr/lib, /usr/sbin isn't really a reason to ask
for making it become an Architecture: all package…

Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: pgpAscX5gMsQU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: