Re: Why no Opera?
Let's add some more browsers:
* Bruce Sass <bmsass@shaw.ca> [070911 22:26]:
> On Tue September 11 2007 11:52:36 am Anthony Towns wrote:
> > name inst vote old recent no-files
> > iceweasel 41897 22448 6839 12600 10
> > epiphany-browser 32506 11395 7614 13493 4
> > w3m 53921 6902 30282 16735 2
> > konqueror 15175 5983 5437 3754 1
> > lynx 14852 5558 7840 1451 3
links 5213 1336 3224 652 1
> > iceape-browser 4802 1974 1706 1122 0
elinks 4111 1484 2245 381 1
> opera 3184 1876 855 450 3
galeon 2090 968 1036 85 1
links2 2430 686 1497 247 0
> > dillo 1810 519 1015 275 1
> > w3m-img 721 0 0 0 721
amaya 405 99 263 43 0
kazehakase 388 91 258 39 0
w3-el-e21 320 0 0 0 0
netsurf 87 19 7 61 0
I'm starting to think we may have almost too many browsers...
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
"Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools are available!"
Niklaus Wirth
Reply to: