Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 09:53:41PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:55:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2007 at 17:50:26 +0000, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > > Just as better alternative IMHO, please consider using `eu-readelf -ds`
> > > from elfutils.
> > elfutils isn't build-essential. binutils is, and does the job, so "it's
> > better IMHO" isn't a particularly compelling reason to make all packages
> > build-depend on a new package.
> So use readelf (from binutils)?
Why? That doesn't appear to output symbol info in a format that's any more
parser-friendly than objdump -T does?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>