Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > We could then have the package field contain multiple packages (separated
> > by "," or "|" or whatever) and have dpkg-shlibdeps generate pkg1 (>=
> > min-ver) | pkg2 (>= min-ver).
>
> I don't think so; at least sometimes you want to depend on
> non-versionned packages, such as virtual provides for ABIs and such.
> For example libnotify1.shlibs:
> libnotify 1 libnotify1 (>= 0.4.4), libnotify1-gtk2.10
This case is not a real concern. The symbol information would be used to
generate the minimal dependency corresponding to "libnotify1 (>= 0.4.4)"
and the "libnotify1-gtk2.10" dependency would be put in the "additional
dependencies" field at the package level.
(This presupposes the enhanced format that I described earlier in this
thread)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>