stunnel (which I'm adpoting) has two mutually incompatible major upstream versions, 3 and 4. Back when 4 was first released, the maintainer packaged it separately, as stunnel4, to avoid the major grief of forcing such an update on users. Since then, stunnel4 has grown a compatibility wrapper script and stunnel3 has been deprecated upstream, with no releases for several years. I would like to finally move the stunnel package over to upstream version 4 and remove the stunnel4 package but I have some doubts on how to proceed and would like some comments. 1. I'll be shipping the compatibility script as /usr/bin/stunnel3 and the main v4 binary as /usr/bin/stunnel4. I'll ship a /usr/bin/stunnel symlink pointing at the wrapper for now, and eventually (after lenny, for sure) change it to point at the v4 binary. 2. Ditto for manpages 3. I will turn the stunnel4 package into a dummy that just pulls the new stunnel. 4. stunnel v3 uses no configuration files, stunnel4 does and its package has them installed on /etc/stunnel4 and similarly named files and dirs. Since the surviving package is to be called stunnel, I think it would be correct for its config files to have no '4' suffix on their names. Nevertheles, I'd like stunnel4 users to have a painles migration, which means somehow grabbing their stunnel4 files and putting them in the new places. Is that a good idea? Should such migration logic be put in the dummy transitional package? Or maybe I should just live with funnily-named conf files for stunnel? Thanks, -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature