On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:32:45AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Very good idea. Although the number 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
> might look simple it's probably not a good idea to hardcode any number
> like 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 into applications. Abstracting
So you're proposing to rename the proposed package name to
"lib09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0"?
I'm in favor of it, but wouldn't this open the flank to future clashes
with ABI version number changes? What will happen when upstream releases
a new, binary-incompatible version of the library without bumping the
number?
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature