On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:11:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I share the feeling of "niceness" of the personal touch, but this isn't > a technical reason, and the point of uniforming a timezone so that it's > easier to compare dates among different changelog is definitely a valid > one. I'm really not convinced about that - I know that the timestamps on my changelog entries often bear only a passing resemblance to the time I did the upload or made any given change. Between sometimes not using dch, making multiple changes and getting round to building, testing or uploading a package there's plenty of room for variation. > So what? A nice post :), but it does not take any side in the present > issue. Given how easy it is to canonicalise the timestamp data, the fact that it's data loss and the questionable utility of the information why is it worth it? -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature