Re: buildd stuff
- To: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: buildd stuff
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:11:12 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070206111112.GD25736@country.grep.be>
- In-reply-to: <E1HC0gD-0004Rd-HH@scyw00225.scy001.de>
- References: <873b5zaoh4.fsf@pasta.gloaming.local> <20070126130258.GE5821@country.grep.be> <45BA4244.6040908@aurel32.net> <87hcuafa5z.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <45BDC69C.80000@aurel32.net> <20070129123959.GA10415@cloud.net.au> <20070130192933.GG24081@country.grep.be> <E1HC0gD-0004Rd-HH@scyw00225.scy001.de>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:38:17PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:29:33 +0100, Wouter Verhelst
> <wouter@debian.org> wrote:
> >It's not that it's sacred; it's that w-b uses a Berkeley DB with a
> >database-level lock for every access (including read-only access); so
> >giving such access to everyone who asks for it will interfere with
> >proper buildd operation.
>
> That looks like bad design to me.
You're assuming wanna-build ever had a "design", rather than "its a
script that organically grew as requirements changed".
--
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
Reply to: