On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 10:07 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > But what is the intended way of fixing things with the newer > > dpkg-shlibdeps ? Adding --rpath ? > > Helping dpkg-shlibdeps with LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the right thing as you did > below... (option -l for dh_shlibdeps) [...] > > I am expecting similar problems with R extensions ... where libR.so is > > in /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so and not even has a SONAME ... > > Wihtout SONAME for a private library is the right thing... no reason to > expect more problems. :-) Thank you very much for your help. Soeren -- For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part