[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: About dpkg-shlibdeps checks

On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 10:07 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > But what is the intended way of fixing things with the newer
> > dpkg-shlibdeps ? Adding --rpath ? 
> Helping dpkg-shlibdeps with LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the right thing as you did
> below... (option -l for dh_shlibdeps)
> > I am expecting similar problems with R extensions ... where libR.so is
> > in /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so and not even has a SONAME ...
> Wihtout SONAME for a private library is the right thing... no reason to
> expect more problems. :-)

Thank you very much for your help.

For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it
will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: