Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Given that shlibs are still used as fallback, I don't see a reason to > remove -V, in particular given that unofficial archs might not have > symbols files when they are arch-specific and when something specific > needs to be done to add support for a new arch. I thought that part of the point of the symbols files was to get more accurate dependency information. If unversioned -V is used, dependencies will remain overly tight. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature