Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:56:04 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ve7v27gb.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071121094934.GG5652@ouaza.com> (Raphael Hertzog's message of "Wed\, 21 Nov 2007 10\:49\:34 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 20071120152256.GA2662@ouaza.com> <[🔎] 878x4szhkt.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 20071121085428.GE5652@ouaza.com> <[🔎] 87pry42c9j.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 20071121094934.GG5652@ouaza.com>

Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:

> Aren't they supposed to have a prototype to avoid such behaviour?

Ah, indeed.  I had forgotten about that.  You're entirely correct.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to:

References:
- Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Packages with empty directories
Next by Date: Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
Previous by thread: Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
Next by thread: Re: Early adopters of symbol based dependencies needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread