Hi, On Friday 09 November 2007 09:38, Frank Küster wrote: > Err, and what exactly is the reason for this? d-d-a isn't exactly > overloaded, and availability of debian infrastructure is something every DD > and maintainer should know about. It's also not like it would create a > problem if we got more frequent status mails from DSA in the future. > > So why should I subscribe to an additional list? Because not every infrastructual bit should/needs to be announced on d-d-a?! Obviously, if ftp-master is down, this needs to go to d-d-a. But if the 3rd amd64 porter machine or the swedish debian mirror is offline for 6h due to scheduled maintainance, this doesnt need to go to d-d-a. But it's nice to have on the infrastructure list. regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgprBhp5gCfAS.pgp
Description: PGP signature