[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dh_install vs. dh_movefiles

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
> >>> Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
> >>> instead of copies.
> >> I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey refuses the idea.
> > I would think that would be a problem if for some reason you have source
> > directory and the build directory on different partitions.
> Or if you're building in AFS, or somewhere else that doesn't allow
> cross-directory hard links.

It's not like it's difficult to make a link if possible and fall back
to copying if not. [Though I personally don't agree that making
hardlinks follows the principle of least astonishment, but perhaps it
could be an option.]

Don Armstrong

"The question of whether computers can think is like the question of
whether submarines can swim."
 -- Edsgar Dijkstra

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Reply to: