[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code

Felipe Sateler wrote:
> That defeats the purpose of autoconf, and makes much of automake's
> functionality redundant. If you are going to require automake, autoconf and
> libtool installed, why then generate the intermediate steps (configure and
> Makefile's)? Plus it defeats another goal of autotools: only developers
> should have it installed, not end users.
> If you go down that road, you'll end up with something like scons.

.. or debhelper

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: