Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 02:34:37 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20071001003437.GA28198@bongo.bofh.it>
- In-reply-to: <20070930224934.GJ29082@p12n.org>
- References: <56f6ed4a0709250836j9c432cen4d808537d7a450b0@mail.gmail.com> <20070925214950.GQ10992@ftbfs.de> <56f6ed4a0709251520t1be9cb74y22ba2284e589cf1a@mail.gmail.com> <20070926121206.GS10992@ftbfs.de> <56f6ed4a0709260546o4d7711dr7775ce8a28d6235b@mail.gmail.com> <20070926134508.GT10992@ftbfs.de> <56f6ed4a0709260953h2c11ef43u1e79603490fbfec8@mail.gmail.com> <20070929201912.GI29082@p12n.org> <56f6ed4a0709301350v35351025o2af5dfc345df1ccb@mail.gmail.com> <20070930224934.GJ29082@p12n.org>
On Oct 01, Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> wrote:
> If enough packages need to do this same thing, it would make sense for
> tzdata to ship a tzdata-source binary package to be build-depended on.
It looks like you may have missed the arm firmware thread of yesterday...
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: