[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: "autobuilder" pseudo-package


On Tuesday 25 September 2007 12:25, Simon Richter wrote:
> inspired by the "how to detect if inside a buildd chroot" thread: would
> it make sense to have an (empty) package "autobuilder" that all packages
> that are not supposed to be installed on autobuilders (daemons, packages
> requiring interactive configuration, ...) can conflict against?

Interactive configuration must be done via debconf by now.

And not wanting to start daemon can have other reasons than autobuilders, eg. 
eg. chroots, fai's nfsroot, piuparts... so "autobuilder" is not a good name.


Attachment: pgp2HGUm44lCV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: