[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Interpreting testing excuses

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 22:02:41 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:

> Hi,
> we are wondering why texlive-base and texlive-bin don't enter testing,
> and I fail to understand the output of the update excuses at 
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texlive-base
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texlive-bin
> We have not (at least not that I remember...) changed any of the
> versioned interdependencies of the texlive packages, so I don't
> understand why the two seem to require going in at the same time at
> all.  And then, why are there those long lists of packages that become
> uninstallable if they would enter testing? How can I find out why the
> scripts think that, and find out whether there's a real issue?
testing has texlive-base 2007-10, and texlive-bin 2007-12.

Package: texlive-base
Version: 2007-12
Depends: texlive-doc-base (>= 2007), texlive-base-bin (>= 2007-13), texlive-common (>= 2007)

so texlive-base needs a newer texlive-bin in testing.

Package: texlive-font-utils
Source: texlive-bin
Version: 2007-14
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.6-1), libkpathsea4 (>= 2007), texlive-base (>= 2007-11), texlive-common (>= 2007)

and texlive-bin needs a newer texlive-base.


Reply to: