On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Ok, just pushed the Homepage field support into dpkg git. Chose Homepage
> as that was what was requested on 142324 and what has mostly been used
> on the pseudo-header in the Description field.
Wow!, that was fast, thanks!!
Can you please give us some details? Some questions follow ...
- if I got this correctly it means that I can start adding 'Homepage'
fields (no heading 'X', no fake fields in description) to my
debian/controls, right?
- should the field be put in the source stanza of debian/control or in
the various binary stanzas?
- probably not dpkg's business, but will the field flow to the Packages
files of the archive? What about the Sources?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature