On Sunday 12 August 2007 13:35:02 Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Reinhard Tartler [Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:27:50 +0200]: > > "Wesley J. Landaker" <wjl@icecavern.net> writes: > > > Is is possible to make the equivalent of an Architecture: any package > > > except that it excludes one or two specific architectures? > > > > I think the best you can do is to write a check for that specific > > architecture in the package's preinst script, and abort the > > installation if it is being installed on that 'blacklisted' > > architecture. > > Uuh, that doesn't sound right. The correct thing to do would be to > ensure the package does not build on the broken architectures, and > remove the binaries from unstable. Won't this then prevent the package from migrating to testing, because it's arch: any, but failing to build on a release arch? -- Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net> <xmpp:wjl@icecavern.net> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.