On Monday 02 July 2007 18:24, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Monday 2 July 2007 17:58, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Monday 02 July 2007 17:45, Bruno Costacurta wrote: > > > uupdate -u ../secpanel-0.5.2.tar > > > New Release will be 0.5.2-1. > > > uupdate: new version 0.5.2-1 <= current version 0.41+0.4.2-3; aborting! > > > > Looks like someone made a typo in a previous upload. 0.41 should probably > > have been 0.4.1 (just guessing though). As it is now the "41" is greater > > than the "5" and thus the new version is not good. > > Looks like you'll need to add an epoch to resolve this (1:0.5.2-1). > > Looking at the changelog, it seems that upstream changed from numbering > their versions from "0.41" to "0.4.2". The previous maintainer solved that > by using the version number "0.41+0.4.2". That yields a strange version > number. It's not needed, you can use indeed an epoch for that. Epochs (e.g. > "1:" at the start of the version number) are intended to solve the > situation where upstream changes the numbering scheme. > > I propose to indeed use 1:0.5.2-1 as the new version number, since > 0.41+0.5.2-1 is even more ugly. > > > Thijs Works fine with epoch '1:' as you indicated. Many thanks for attention. Bye, Bruno -- PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51 Key : http://www.costacurta.org/keys/bruno_costacurta_pgp_key.html Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51 --
Attachment:
pgp8YyPX_XXK3.pgp
Description: PGP signature