On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:50:52AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes: > >> This check would fail many packages that can still be built twice in a > >> row (any package that runs autotools during the build process without > >> doing a complicated dance to preserve the upstream-shipped files, for > >> example), and it's not clear to me that there's a consensus that those > >> packages are really broken. > > But exceedingly anoying when doing a patch and debdiff. > Not if you use pdebuild or similarly build in a chroot, which IMO everyone > should be doing. I find that it's still useful to be able to do repeated edit, compile and run cycles during development, if only for performance. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature